Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!fortune!grw
From: grw@fortune.UUCP (Glenn Wichman)
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: "...Temple of Doom", a PRO review!
Message-ID: <3481@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 30-May-84 21:20:44 EDT
Article-I.D.: fortune.3481
Posted: Wed May 30 21:20:44 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 2-Jun-84 08:06:40 EDT
References: <458@ccieng5.UUCP>
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 31

[C-3P0! Reach in and pull the lever with the bugs on it!]

	Well, I object.

	1. Your article was not so much a PRO review of IJ&TD, but
	    an CON review of those who panned IJ&TD

	2. I think it unkind and uncalled for to call someone "off his
	    rocker" because s/he didn't enjoy this picture.
	    
	I know it was supposed to be a fun movie.  I didn't have fun.
	The purpose of my review was to let others with similar tastes
	to mine know that they ought not waste their money.  It's fine
	that you enjoyed it.  I don't think that I am in ANY way
	mentally deficient for having not enjoyed it.  By the way,
	just so you know, I like FUN movies, such as:

		Muppet Movie
		Xanadu
		Romancing the Stone
		etc.

	I did not feel insulted by these movies.  I did by IJ&TD.

	(uncalled for sarcastic remark coming -- WARNING WARNING)
	Maybe if I got off on child abuse, mutilation, sexism, etc.
	I would have had fun at this movie
	(uncalled for sarcastic remark complete)

						-Glenn