Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!mcnc!unc-c!dya
From: dya@unc-c.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Open Sesame
Message-ID: <1347@unc-c.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-May-84 10:19:49 EDT
Article-I.D.: unc-c.1347
Posted: Wed May  2 10:19:49 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 3-May-84 19:26:37 EDT
Lines: 19

References: pthya.121


   Two people have already made this observation.

   Could we bury this ( net.music.*.* discussion ) for awhile until some
statistics can be compiled on how much different traffic there is in it ?
I personally wouldn't mind net.music.folk ( net.wobegon in general ) but
the 1.0E-03% of the population who listens to 60's folk doesn't justify
another newsgroup. Perhaps an earlier suggestion ( justification along the
lines of the way the Federal Cookie Company divided up the FM band --
lower 1/5th aesthestic, upper 4/5ths commercial ) is how we should divide
up net.music for the time being. NO FLAMES FOR CALLING net.music NONAESTHETIC-
I think most people are mature enough to recognise that the FM Band is
in fact divided up across some pretty well defined line. (That is, you
haven't heard an hour of Quiet Riot on your local NPR/APR affiliate, have
you ? )

dya