Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fisher.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!astrovax!fisher!david
From: david@fisher.UUCP (David Rubin)
Newsgroups: net.music.classical,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Survey of net.music.classical readers
Message-ID: <151@fisher.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-May-84 08:04:10 EDT
Article-I.D.: fisher.151
Posted: Thu May 10 08:04:10 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 07:44:20 EDT
References: <651@pyuxn.UUCP>
Organization: Princeton Univ. Statistics
Lines: 16



You don't have to be a Statistician to recognize a slanted survey.

As Burt Lance said, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it"; this group is working.

Finally, why label this group as secessionist? Why not net.sport.hoops or
net.rec.bridge? And is there a reason other than historical accident that
net.music wasn't itself labeled net.arts.music, and thus open to criticism
for isolating itself from other arts?

Why is this specialization more sinister than others?

							David Rubin
							allegra!fisher!david