Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site eosp1.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!eosp1!robison From: robison@eosp1.UUCP (Tobias D. Robison) Newsgroups: net.music.classical Subject: Re: Beware: Old Instruments aren't performed traditionally Message-ID: <872@eosp1.UUCP> Date: Thu, 10-May-84 12:58:06 EDT Article-I.D.: eosp1.872 Posted: Thu May 10 12:58:06 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 08:45:26 EDT Organization: Exxon Office Systems, Princeton, NJ Lines: 31 References: It is pleasurable and instructive to listen to performances of old instruments. But beware of the many ways that they are probably not being played or heard in the traditional manner. Ancient wind instruments usually sound out of tune. It is possible they were played as in tune (but to different scales!) as modern instruments. Most modern virtuosi spend years playing one instrument to get really good at intonation. Most players of ancient instruments do not know their instrument so well. (The same argument goes for technique in general.) Methods of making reeds may have changed. Shawms always seem to have a shwoopsy attack below pitch for every note. I have heard the alto and tenor shawm played with a clean attack on every note. It can be done, but WAS it traditionally done? String technique has changed enormously. Even changes in styles of accenting notes and slurring have an enormous effect on the sound of string instruments. The worst problem of all -- we moderns HEAR instruments differently from our ancestors. It's hard to account for this difference, but it is an immense factor. A recent example of what I mean -- those of you who are old enough will remember that Rock music in the 1950's was considered to be incredibly heavy and pounding in its rhythms. The heavy, pounding rock recordings of the 50's sound light and delicate today. - Toby Robison (not Robinson!) allegra!eosp1!robison decvax!ittvax!eosp1!robison princeton!eosp1!robison