Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxn.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!harpo!ulysses!gamma!pyuxww!pyuxn!rlr
From: rlr@pyuxn.UUCP (Rich Rosen)
Newsgroups: net.music,net.music.classical
Subject: Reply to Denise O'Jibway
Message-ID: <663@pyuxn.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-May-84 09:29:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: pyuxn.663
Posted: Mon May 14 09:29:19 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 15-May-84 05:39:48 EDT
References: <134@sdchema.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Communications Research, Piscataway N.J.
Lines: 16

> Oh I am so tired of seeing articles in both net.music and
> net.music.classical.  If we are going to have a separate
> newgroup can't it at least be separate?  [sdchema!djo]

This is a consequence of having a subgroup.  When a subject comes
up that is of general interest (like technical music topics such as
the discussion on absolute pitch), the topic belongs in the parent
group, except that we know that many readers/supporters of
net.music.classical do not read net.music proper (precisely the
reason why the group was created----so they wouldn't have to read
through net.music).  So how do we make use of their potential
expertise on the topic, unless we submit to net.music.classical
as well?  [This is NOT an "I told you so".]
-- 
"You are not SAM.  You are not ISAM!!!"
					Rich Rosen    pyuxn!rlr