Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sjuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!psuvax!burdvax!sjuvax!bbanerje
From: bbanerje@sjuvax.UUCP (B. Banerjee)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.tv
Subject: Re: Request for net.tv.soaps
Message-ID: <289@sjuvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 7-May-84 02:06:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: sjuvax.289
Posted: Mon May  7 02:06:14 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 9-May-84 02:47:12 EDT
References: <639@ihuxb.UUCP> <103@tilt.UUCP>
Organization: Saint Josephs Univ. Phila., Pa.
Lines: 22


>> I think that when over a third of the articles regularly appearing in a 
>> group relate to a subset of that group and there are howls of anguish
>> over this fact, then it's time to form another group.

Ok, I'm sort of ambivalent on this one.  I just checked our spool files
and found that we have 77 articles in net.tv (our default expiration
is 2 weeks).  This means that we get an average of maybe 6 articles
a day in this group.  One third of these works out to about 2 articles
a day.  I can certainly type 'n' to 2 articles a day!

However, I *loathe* soaps, so if one of you wishes to create
net.tv.soaps, I certainly won't stand in your way.  If created,
we SHOULD move the evening soaps (Dullest, Dy-trashy, etc.) there as
well.

Regards,
-- 


				Binayak Banerjee
		{allegra | astrovax | bpa | burdvax}!sjuvax!bbanerje