Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-ngp.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!ut-sally!ut-ngp!werner
From: werner@ut-ngp.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: Keywords: net.general, using it right, flame, comments, *argh*
Message-ID: <581@ut-ngp.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 9-May-84 11:00:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: ut-ngp.581
Posted: Wed May  9 11:00:25 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 09:36:32 EDT
References: <913@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: Comp. Center, Univ. of Texas at Austin
Lines: 10

[ THINK BIG ... and if that doesn't work THINK BIGGER (words on my wall) ]

no flames from me, chuqui, those words were needed.

I still believe that it would be acceptable to allow SOME people to cancel
articles or put them in different news-groups, so that the other sites
down-stream (news-wise) are not bothered by it.  It's no extra work for
someone who just read an article to do that, given the commands are provided
to do that easily.  Of course, there might be no easy way to do that, I don't
know.  Would anyone care to comment?