Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site randvax.ARPA Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!harpo!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!randvax!edhall From: edhall@randvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.origins,net.politics Subject: Re: Louisiana Creationism Law Message-ID: <1790@randvax.ARPA> Date: Thu, 17-May-84 12:16:35 EDT Article-I.D.: randvax.1790 Posted: Thu May 17 12:16:35 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 19-May-84 00:52:40 EDT References: <930@ihuxq.UUCP>, <38@mouton.UUCP> Organization: Rand Corp., Santa Monica Lines: 45 Xref: 89 908 + > Many Conservatives believe that pure anti-creationism as taught > in many public schools undermines a person's self-worth concept, > deteriorates the human psyche, drives a person to alcohol and other drugs, > and thus subverts a nation's productivity and efficiency. That's why > alcoholism is the USSR's number one problem, and why alcoholism and drug > addiction is becoming the USA's number one problem. > > Now do you see why many Conservatives believe that pure > anti-creationism should be diluted with creationism, and that pure > anti-creationism advocates may well be "Commies", "Commie-sympathizers," > or unwitting dupes of the international Communist conspiracy? [~ :-)] > > -Dave Caplan > I'm speechless... If there is an ounce of logic in the above, I'd like to hear about it. I see no connection whatever between the teaching of evolution, and alcoholism and drug-abuse. I see no reason for labeling evolution as `anti-creationism'. (Methinks it is more likely to be the other way around, but that's a bias.) And how does this tie the teaching of evolution into the international Communist conspiracy? Why don't any of the `many Conservatives' I know believe any of what Dave Caplan says? Maybe they are unwitting Commie dupes. Or perhaps they realize that the evolution/creationism controversy is an honest one, and not one based on a Communist hoax. And maybe they realize that there are factors far more important in producing self-worth than ones belief in ones origins. They are far more likely to see lagging productivity as a symptom of excessive government control than as a result of the teaching of evolution. Branding all you disagree with as a Communist conspiracy has absolutely nothing to do with traditional Conservatism. Now, Conservatives take the Communist threat very, very seriously, but they don't see a Commie under every bed, nor consider every `Liberal' cause to be Communist- inspired. However, certain members of the Radical Right have appropriated the Conservative label, and have used it to add respectability to their militant advocacy. Don't be fooled; many of these people want far more profound changes to our society than almost any Liberal, and justify their use of the term Conservative by manufacturing a `past' that is almost entirely mythical. -Ed Hall decvax!randvax!edhall