Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!emjej
From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: A reply to T.C. Wheeler--the case fo - (nf)
Message-ID: <5000087@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 29-Apr-84 14:48:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5000087
Posted: Sun Apr 29 14:48:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 4-May-84 00:28:07 EDT
References: <2718@azure.UUCP>
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #R:azure:-271800:uokvax:5000087:000:805
Nf-From: uokvax!emjej    Apr 29 13:48:00 1984

#R:azure:-271800:uokvax:5000087:000:805
uokvax!emjej    Apr 29 13:48:00 1984

/***** uokvax:net.politics / azure!jonw /  7:28 am  Apr 25, 1984 */
The case for conservation and the reasons why it has not yet caught on to the
extent that it should in this country is a fairly complex issue that I don't
want to get into here.  What I will do is mention what a few examples to give 
you an idea of what is possible.

Conservation is a 
very significant, but all to often ignored, energy source...
/* ---------- */

And people are starting to see the secondary effects of conservation already,
what with people breathing various obnoxious things given off by insulation
and sealed in their energy-efficient houses. All choices have side effects,
not just the ones that the media have fun scaring people with. Let us use
the same yardstick in comparing safety, please.

						James Jones