Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site ea.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!ea!mwm
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Enforced socialism?!?!?!? - (nf)
Message-ID: <10100044@ea.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 1-May-84 22:53:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ea.10100044
Posted: Tue May  1 22:53:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 6-May-84 01:22:57 EDT
References: <519@mprvaxa.UUCP>
Lines: 31
Nf-ID: #R:mprvaxa:-51900:ea:10100044:000:803
Nf-From: ea!mwm    May  1 21:53:00 1984

#R:mprvaxa:-51900:ea:10100044:000:803
ea!mwm    May  1 21:53:00 1984

/***** ea:net.politics / mit-eddi!lkk /  5:52 am  Apr 27, 1984 */
From: mwm@ea.UUCP
Scott, you're being unfair to corporate monopolies. Corporations haven't:

	1) Passed laws forcing you to buy from them, and only them.
	2) Made it illegal to build your own.
	3) Made it illegal to do by hand what their tools make easier.

Organizing to increase your market value isn't a bad thing. Passing laws that
*require* others to pay what you consider your market value to be is a bad
thing.

	<mike
-----

Right, and nobody forces poor people to sleep in subway stations.

Larry Kolodney
(The Devil's Advocate)

(USE)    ..decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!lkk  
(ARPA)	lkk@mit-mc
/* ---------- */

Since unions and poor people haven't had much to do with each other lately,
could you explain your non sequitor?

	<mike