Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ames-lm.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!mcnc!decvax!harpo!seismo!hao!ames-lm!barry From: barry@ames-lm.UUCP (Kenn Barry) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Muslim States and Political Regressiveness Message-ID: <246@ames-lm.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13-May-84 14:55:17 EDT Article-I.D.: ames-lm.246 Posted: Sun May 13 14:55:17 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 15-May-84 02:51:15 EDT References: <250@hou2g.UUCP> <331@teldata.UUCP>, <474@ihuxt.UUCP> <1786@randvax.ARPA>, <479@ihuxt.UUCP> Organization: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mtn. View, CA Lines: 65 [*************=8>:) (snort)] Mr. Martillo, I have not had occasion to respond to any of your postings before, but I am a pretty faithful reader of them. I would credit your messages (and the responses to them) for making net.religion.- jewish interesting reading even to non-Jews such as myself. I must disagree with your call for the annihilition of the Arab states, for two reasons. First, I'm afraid it's simply unrealistic. WHO is to annihilate these states? If by "Westerners" you mean Western Europe and the U.S., don't you think the Eastern bloc nations (the Soviets) might get a teeny bit upset about the West colonizing North Africa? Not that I respect their opinions much, but I do respect their military might. Soviets aside, I would still question whether such colonization would be feasible. The French tried very hard to hang on to Algeria for many years, with no success. The U.S. experience in Vietnam also suggests to me that such an attempt at colonization would be unsuccessful. The days of European colonialism are gone, not for moral reasons, but for practical ones. Any government's rule requires at least tacit acceptance of their suzerainty by the subject population. I wouldn't say (as some do) that people always get the government they deserve, but they DO always get a government they can tolerate, by definition. I think the history of the world since WW II shows clearly that European colonialism can no longer command the minimal cooperation from the colonials which is essential to maintain power. On to my other objection. You claim that your hatred is of the Islamic governments, and not the people. If so, how does it follow that "the only possibility is a return to [Western] colonialism"? By claiming this, are you not therefore claiming, not only that the present Islamic rulers are unfit, but also that the Muslim peoples are incapable of self-rule, period? I share your intense distaste for some of the governments you criticize, but I am not so contemptuous of the people they rule that I conclude they are unable to do better. You compare your call for the annihilation of these Islamic states with a call to annihilate Nazi Germany in the 30's but, by your logic, we should not only have destroyed the Nazi regime, but also should have taken over the rulership of Germany. We did not do this; the Russians, however, did. Do you think that East Germany is a good model of what to do with countries whose governments we dislike? Or do you argue that the Germans, Naziism notwithstanding, are more 'civilized' than the Arabs? Truly, it seems that this is exactly what you are saying. And this is where I cannot agree with you. It is comforting to believe that atrocities and horrors are committed only by others, by peoples less civilized than ourselves. Unfortunately, the capacity to be 'good little Nazis' is there in all of us, as Stanley Milgram demonstrated some years back. Indeed, belief in the moral superiority of one's own group is precisely the sort of philosophy that leads to fanatical excess and genocide. As Walt Kelly observed (in "Pogo"), "We have met the enemy, and he is us." [The opinions expressed herein are my own foolishness, and do not necessarily reflect the views of anyone that matters.] Kenn Barry NASA-Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Electric Avenue: {dual,hao,menlo70,hplabs}!ames-lm!barry