Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site tellab1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!tellab1!heahd
From: heahd@tellab1.UUCP (Dan Wood)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: participative democracy
Message-ID: <175@tellab1.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-May-84 10:40:31 EDT
Article-I.D.: tellab1.175
Posted: Tue May 22 10:40:31 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 23-May-84 19:05:32 EDT
References: <2285@harpo.UUCP>
Organization: Tellabs, Inc., Lisle, Ill.
Lines: 19


   It strikes me that the net is already an experiment in participative
democracy: Users are free to participate or not as they see fit; new news
groups are added according to the votes of interested partys; we have no
legislative bodies, executive branch, or judiciary; and the only restraints
placed on net users are those self-inflicted ones of discreation and
restraint. What more do you want?

   (I know some of you out there are thinking "What about the case of Tim X who
apparently lost his position at NCU for speaking too freely"? Well, I didn't
get involved in that contorversey until rather late in the game -I've only
been on the net for a couple of weeks- so I'm not aware of the facts of the
incident. But, from what I have been able to gather, Mr. X over stepped the 
self-inflicted bounds I listed above. As anyone can see by reading the other
articles I've posted on the net I'm no friend of the christians [see, I
don't even capitalize the word], but I see no reason to get personally abusive
about it either. I try to make my point with logic and reason, not by name
calling.)