Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mhuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!mhuxi!dsg
From: dsg@mhuxi.UUCP (GREEN)
Newsgroups: net.rec.photo
Subject: Re: Info request on Olympus OM-4
Message-ID: <110@mhuxi.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 3-May-84 16:11:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: mhuxi.110
Posted: Thu May  3 16:11:52 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 4-May-84 05:02:39 EDT
References: <206@hou2f.UUCP> <261@pucc-i>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 11

[]

As long as the major source of revenue for "fan" magazines is advertising;
I would read equipment reviews "with a grain of salt" and "between the lines".
Has anyone out there ever read a *bad* equipment review of a product from
a major manufacturer/distributer/advertisor?
David S. Green
Bell Labs  ..mhuxi!dsg
P. S. I could be more specific but I don't want to be sued for libel by
my former employer ( Berkey Marketing Companies ) or  a family friend,
Sid Holz, Publisher of one of the major mags.