Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.13 $; site iuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!dsaker
From: dsaker@iuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: Russell Anderson's Enoch article
Message-ID: <1700022@iuvax.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-May-84 21:50:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: iuvax.1700022
Posted: Tue May 29 21:50:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 1-Jun-84 08:27:56 EDT
References: <1102@ihuxr.UUCP>
Lines: 19
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxr:-110200:iuvax:1700022:000:754
Nf-From: iuvax!dsaker    May 29 20:50:00 1984


[]
Lew Mammel - Hey! I'm impressed by your library search.  This sort of
amateur scholarship is great.  Thank-you for doing something that I would 
probably never have got around to.  

I too had some doubts about when various texts first became available in
Europe, England & America.  

What Russell Anderson presented as evidence is impressive IF the claims at
the start-up to it all are true.  You have cast a great doubt on that IF.
I mean, if Russell's statement about the availability of the Enoch stuff
is false, then the supports standing underneath the claims for Joseph Smith
are shaky.

Thanks generally for excellent articles.

                                    Daryel Akerlind
                                 ...ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!dsaker