Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!mit-eddie!gds
From: gds@mit-eddie.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: review of 'The Planiverse' - (nf)
Message-ID: <1882@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 19-May-84 14:03:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1882
Posted: Sat May 19 14:03:41 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 21-May-84 03:14:58 EDT
References: <165@ism780.UUCP>
Organization: MIT Lusers and Hosers Inc., Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 15

When I think of 2-D, I think in the x-y plane, not the x-z plane.  In
the x-y plane, there is no such thing as "down", "under", etc.  To take
your analogy, ask a kindergarten to draw what lies behind the house.
Can't be done in the x-z plane.

I always thought the traditional way of 2-D thinking was in the x-y
plane.  Mayhaps we have a "visitor" on the net :-)
-- 
					Be ye moby,
					for I am moby.

Greg Skinner (gregbo)
{decvax!genrad, eagle!mit-vax, ihnp4}!mit-eddie!gds

Joy is in the ears that hear.