Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site trsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!trsvax!cozadde
From: cozadde@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: Re: Re: Space Station - (nf)
Message-ID: <56000010@trsvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 19-Mar-84 04:30:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.56000010
Posted: Mon Mar 19 04:30:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 18-May-84 01:49:43 EDT
References: <386@ihlts.UUCP>
Lines: 21
Nf-ID: #R:ihlts:-38600:trsvax:56000010:000:624
Nf-From: trsvax!cozadde    Mar 19 12:30:00 1984

#R:ihlts:-38600:trsvax:56000010:000:624
trsvax!cozadde    Mar 19 12:30:00 1984



	To: Phil

	Bravo!!!!

	That was one of the most balanced statements I have seen on the
	debate between "manned" and "machined" space missions.  The jealous
	bickering between the two sides just creates the ammo needed to
	destroy both sides by the 'anti-space' types.  The Proxmires of this
	world just love to have these love-spats in front of a bunch of Con-
	gressmen that have hordes of special interests groups demanding their
	"fair share" of the taxpayers' wallet be taken out of the space (both
	"manned" & "machined") programs.

					lt. of marines
					...microsoft!trsvax!cozadde
					...ctvax!trsvax!cozadde