Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: nyu notesfiles V1.1 4/1/84; site tilt.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!tilt!smw From: smw@tilt.UUCP Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: Can I read Star Trek III articles??? Message-ID: <5500001@tilt.UUCP> Date: Sun, 20-May-84 20:34:00 EDT Article-I.D.: tilt.5500001 Posted: Sun May 20 20:34:00 1984 Date-Received: Mon, 21-May-84 03:12:02 EDT References: <1323@pegasus.UUCP> Organization: Princeton University Lines: 18 Nf-ID: #R:pegasus:-132300:tilt:5500001:000:870 Nf-From: tilt!smw May 19 20:34:00 1984 I would recommend a general net.startrek policy for after June 1 (The Day), to be in effect for about a month. That'll give *everybody* time to see it... (1) Let's avoid subject lines that are giveaways in themselves... e.g, for ST2, an article "Why Did Spock Have To Die?" would ruin things for some people. (2) UNLESS the subject line specifically says , we can assume it IS a spoiler. After all, we're going to have LOTS of discussion on the plot once it's known. We're having plenty *before* it's (officially) known. Easy enough, and it'll help keep the suspense going for those who prefer it that way. (I succumbed to the temptation long ago, and avidly read the spoiler articles, myself.) -- Stewart Wiener / Princeton Univ. EECS / princeton!tilt!smw Graduating & seeking work... can YOUR site use an entry-level Unix programmer?