Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site zehntel.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!jackh From: jackh@zehntel.UUCP (jack hagerty) Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: Star Trek Pilot - The Cage Message-ID: <1495@zehntel.UUCP> Date: Thu, 24-May-84 21:03:46 EDT Article-I.D.: zehntel.1495 Posted: Thu May 24 21:03:46 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 31-May-84 19:41:59 EDT References: <1918@mit-eddie.UUCP> Organization: Zehntel Inc., Walnut Creek, CA Lines: 37 >Mark Vita writes: >> However, Roddenberry still had the first pilot, and it was >>too good to waste. So, a "framework" was constructed during >>the "current time" of the show, -------------------- >This is not quite how I heard it. I heard that they were getting behind >schedule, due to the fact that they were so ambitious, and no one had >done such an elaborate TV show before. So, they realized that they >could make up some lost time by making a shorter new episode and filling >in the time with the unseen pilot. > Barry Margolin That is absoutely correct. To take things one step further, I remember distinctly during the first season's original airing that NBC re-ran an earlier episode ("What Are Little Girls Made Of", I believe) in February '67. I was a freshman in high school at the time and much more tuned in to TV than today. I remember thinking at the time that it was much to early to begin re-runs which *everyone* knows don't start 'till late March. Years later, when reading "Making of" I found out about all of the production problems the first season. It made perfect sense to me that they would re-run an earlier episode to buy time, but no one I've talked to remembers this happening. I refuse to believe that my memory has been tampered with. Can anyone save my sanity? A related trivia question: The very last original episode missed its air date by nearly three months. Why? -- Jack Hagerty, Zehntel Inc. !ihnp4!zehntel!jackh