Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 beta 3/9/83; site cosivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!mb2c!uofm-cv!cosivax!dzd
From: dzd@cosivax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Another Lint Koan? -- (Oops)
Message-ID: <153@cosivax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 26-Apr-84 07:40:19 EDT
Article-I.D.: cosivax.153
Posted: Thu Apr 26 07:40:19 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 4-May-84 05:25:29 EDT
Organization: C.O.S.I.
Lines: 26

Thanks  to  Peter Gross for pointing out that I made a typo in my
previous posting concerning a lint  problem;  I  had  "@time_sec"
where  I  meant  "&time_sec".   This  made the problem sound like
merely a complaint on the obscurity of lint's error messages.  It
was correct (&) in the original program.  In fact, my problem  is
not  a  complaint  about  lint  reporting  a syntax error with an
obscure message but rather that  it  complained  at  all  on  one
version (VAX with Eunice) but not on another (VENIX).

As far as I can see, there is no error in the program, especially
in  type-declarations  of  localtime()  and  p.   Thus  I tend to
believe VENIX but not Eunice.  But no matter my personal beliefs,
*one of them* is wrong.  I would be interested to hear what other
"lints" think about this program.  If Eunice "lint" is wrong, its
system administrator would like to know about it.   If  VENIX  is
wrong,   I  would  like  to  know  it.   (The  VAX  is  owned  by
Environmental Research Institute of Michigan  and  the  IBM-PC/XT
with VENIX is my own.)

Dean Douthat

UUCP:   ...!sb1!mb2c!uofm-cv!cosivax!dzd |  Mail: Zahntron, Inc.
Ma:         (313) 995-9762               |        330 E. Liberty
MCI Mail:   DDOUTHAT 187-3270            |        Suite 3B
TWX/TELEX:  6501873270                   |        Ann Arbor, MI
Answerback: 6501873270 MCI               |                 48104