Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-vgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!brl-vgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: termcap test routine???
Message-ID: <1526@brl-vgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 7-May-84 22:06:25 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-vgr.1526
Posted: Mon May  7 22:06:25 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 13-May-84 00:38:50 EDT
References: <424@noscvax.UUCP> <1413@brl-vgr.ARPA>, <6936@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistics Research Lab
Lines: 10

I agree that terminfo is superior to termcap.  Too bad that 4.?BSD
doesn't have it.

AL & DL (with numeric parameter) have been supported by Horton for
years.  I believe that all current termcap-driven implementations
of "vi" support them.

Is pc= really constrained to one char?  Golly, I didn't know that.

Let's hear it for all those terminal designers!  :-<