Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-vgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!brl-vgr!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-vgr.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: net.unix,net.sources,net.wanted
Subject: Re: Want sh -> csh translator (and vice-versa)
Message-ID: <1525@brl-vgr.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 7-May-84 21:54:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-vgr.1525
Posted: Mon May  7 21:54:40 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 13-May-84 00:38:33 EDT
References: <1192@proper.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistics Research Lab
Lines: 8
Keywords: C-shell,Bourne shell,scripts,translators
Xref: 676 139 732

It would be interesting to hear your reasons for taking Bourne
shell scripts and translating them to the Cshell.  Most people
consider the Bourne shell to be the superior programming language
for shell scripts.

Not knocking you, you may have a perfectly valid reason; it's just
that I can't think of any..
:-)