Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 Fluke 1/4/84; site fluke.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!akgua!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!tektronix!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!tron
From: tron@fluke.UUCP (Peter F. Barbee)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.women
Subject: Re: Allstate Insurance says women don't deserve equal pay with men
Message-ID: <611@vax1.fluke.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 21-May-84 19:52:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: vax1.611
Posted: Mon May 21 19:52:38 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 26-May-84 11:56:42 EDT
References: <621@pyuxqq.UUCP> <169@digi-g.UUCP>
Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Everett, WA
Lines: 15
Xref: 513 698

I almost feel bad because this is the second reply I've made to
this discussion but:

If women recieve the same yearly benefits from a retirement plan
after *investing* the same amount into said plan as a man then
I don't want to deal with that insurance company.

Pension plans are based on life expectancy not sexual equality.

Of course, by the time our generation reaches *the golden years* 
male/female life expectancies may be nearly equal. 

I, too, dream of a time when our only percieved sexual differences
are physical.
				Peter Barbee