Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site aluxe.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!aluxe!2141smh From: 2141smh@aluxe.UUCP (henning) Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: manditory seatbelt laws ??? Message-ID: <179@aluxe.UUCP> Date: Sat, 9-Jun-84 13:46:20 EDT Article-I.D.: aluxe.179 Posted: Sat Jun 9 13:46:20 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 10-Jun-84 01:17:21 EDT References: <256@houem.UUCP> <2631@watcgl.UUCP>, <247@ihu1h.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Allentown, PA Lines: 22 **** **** From the keys of Steve Henning, AT&T Bell Labs, Reading, PA aluxe!2141smh <> <> <> <> <<(I don't believe in laws against suicide either).>> You hit the nail on the head. We do need laws to protect those of us who faithfully use our seatbelts from injury claims from those free spirits who get beat up and killed because they don't choose to wear seatbelts. Seatbelts do work. My wife was in a headon collision which caused $4700 dollars damage to our Volvo and escaped without a scratch because she had her seat belt/shoulder harness fastened. A local woman who was in a similar accident the same day, 6 weeks ago, is still in the hospital having her face put back together again because she didn't have her seat belt on. Seatbelts do work. The public should not be liable for injuries of those who don't use them. That is contributory negligence.