Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.08 10/3/83; site psuvax1.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!unc!mcnc!akgua!psuvax1!simon
From: simon@psuvax1.UUCP (Janos Simon)
Newsgroups: net.ai
Subject: Re: Human Models
Message-ID: <1093@psuvax1.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Jun-84 10:40:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: psuvax1.1093
Posted: Fri Jun 29 10:40:52 1984
Date-Received: Mon, 2-Jul-84 00:22:51 EDT
References: <1137@sri-arpa.UUCP> <514@spuxll.UUCP>
Organization: Pennsylvania State Univ.
Lines: 9

Incorrect argument: "You cannot model the brain at a quantum-mechanical level,
you must use a higher order (deterministic, non-molecular) one".
Why?
You cannot make a simulator that is an exact replica, and expect it to be fasterBut there's no reason why there couldn't be a quark computer, working at 
incredible speeds (and probably getting the answers).
In fact the reverse question is more interesting: how fast can you simulate
the real world?
js