Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1g.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!ihu1g!fish From: fish@ihu1g.UUCP (Bob Fishell) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: The Jow of CD Message-ID: <455@ihu1g.UUCP> Date: Wed, 27-Jun-84 16:42:59 EDT Article-I.D.: ihu1g.455 Posted: Wed Jun 27 16:42:59 1984 Date-Received: Thu, 28-Jun-84 06:09:41 EDT References: <43@sunybcs.UUCP> <465@houxa.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 38 >and to those of you (hound!rfg et al) who have patiently explained to our >ego-intellectual friend why he's missing a few points: it's been a pleasure >reading some of your knowledgeable, factual submissions. Oh, don't bother, Chuck. I've been pondering the remarks of our digiphobic friend and have come to some tentative hypotheses (pending further investigation). 1) The technical content of the articles posted is obviously confused. This leads me to conclude that this person is either flunking all his EE courses, or has never taken any EE courses. Since his spelling and grammar are about as competent as his electronics expertise, I'd expect the former. (That's one) 2) Our friend is playing gadfly just to see if he can get our collective goat. In this case, his misinformed remarks are deliberate, and have been offered with the intent of provoking the exact kind of discussion that has followed. What the hell is so important about square waves, anyway? Should this be the intent of the articles in question, the author has succeeded admirably. (That's another) 3) The author is actually a Soviet spy engaged in gathering information about digital signal processing, and is trying to get some one to blunder away trade secrets in a moment of exasperation. (That's yet another...OK, it's getting a bit deep, I know, I know) In any case, I suggest that further discussion on this topic or any further offerings from our irritating friend be managed with a little less seriousness...If hypothesis (1) is correct, it's pointless to argue with a moron who's sure of himself. If hypothesis (2) is correct (as I suspect), he's had his little laugh at our expense already. And if he's a Russki, let's start feeding him information on plain 'ol analog recording techniques. Maybe then Melodiya will start producing some decent records. -- Bob Fishell ihnp4!ihu1g!fish