Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert
From: seifert@ihuxl.UUCP (D.A. Seifert)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Tubes/bipolar/FETs (Hafler amps)
Message-ID: <1212@ihuxl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 4-Jul-84 10:28:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: ihuxl.1212
Posted: Wed Jul  4 10:28:09 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 5-Jul-84 00:32:22 EDT
References: <494@drutx.UUCP> <2887@rabbit.UUCP> <515@drutx.UUCP> <566@opus.UUCP>, <1203@ihuxl.UUCP> <2762@watcgl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 23

> I hadn't heard bad comments about the Hafler preamp before - which one
> is it (Hafler 100 or 110) that "everyone has replaced"?

Asked Joe about it yesterday, and he said they were the 101s.
(ok, is it 100 or 101?  -sigh- ) He said the 110 was supposed to be
much better.

The problem was that the frequency response in the bass region was
not flat.  (and perhaps they both had money burning a hole in their
pockets?  :-)   )

Once again, this only applies to the 100/101, not to Hafler products
in general.  I am quite pleased with my DH 200 power amp.  Joe bought
two of them and strapped them for mono. (We WILL keep our speaker
wires short!)

	Florescent light hum is cruel and inhuman punishment!
-- 
	_____
       /_____\		Hey, Woodstock, have you seen the demagnetizer?
      /_______\	
	|___|			    Snoopy
    ____|___|_____	       ihnp4!ihuxl!seifert