Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site sunybcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!rochester!rocksvax!sunybcs!charles
From: charles@sunybcs.UUCP (Charles E. Pearson)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: CD and sample rate
Message-ID: <90@sunybcs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Jul-84 15:01:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: sunybcs.90
Posted: Mon Jul  2 15:01:15 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 13-Jul-84 03:49:22 EDT
References: <2922@rabbit.UUCP>
Organization: SUNY/Buffalo Computer Science
Lines: 37

And would you care to annalyze the dispersion patters and
their differences of the two cases, 
1) a normal CD (egads)
2) the multi-plexed mono with a speaker 1/4 inch closer to the ear.
 
The problems with earphones, (some people do use them, try the
STAX PRO LAMBDA for a good example).
 
How the same 'technoloy' could be used to give us a better sample 
rate and/or a better resolution...
 
How the discontunity of any frequency will produce harmonic distortions
and the effect on the already problematic item.
 
What that does to immaging, if CDs had any to begin with.
 
How adjusting the balance control does not correct the problem.
 
Timing problems for the single (mono) reading head and how that may
effect channel separation... give you a hint, if the timing is off
it would wander back and forth between producing left/right signals
and producing right/left signals.  This timing could be only off by
one part per billion for this effect to become apparent (unless
you have a truely flat immaging system.
 
 
                                    Charles E. Pearson

UUCP:		{allegra, seismo}!rochester!rocksvax!sunybcs!charles
		decvax!watmath!sunybcs!charles
ARPA & CSNET:	charles.buffalo@rand-relay
Physical:       University Computing Services
                4250 Ridge Lea Road
                room 28
		SUNY Center at Buffalo
		Amherst, NY  14226