Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site uicsl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!uicsl!keller
From: keller@uicsl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Carver vs Levinson, etc - (nf)
Message-ID: <21100003@uicsl.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Jul-84 22:52:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uicsl.21100003
Posted: Fri Jul 13 22:52:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Jul-84 02:11:54 EDT
Lines: 20
Nf-ID: #N:uicsl:21100003:000:641
Nf-From: uicsl!keller    Jul 13 21:52:00 1984

#N:uicsl:21100003:000:641
uicsl!keller    Jul 13 21:52:00 1984

(Nobody told me there'd be days like these.)

Now on to the question of the week:

If Bob Carver can make his amps sound just like a Levinson ML-9(model?)
why not buy a Carver amp. (Hell, why not buy it even if it doesn't match
the ML-9!)

OK, enough already! If you have $30,000 to spend on a stereo and don't
like analytical methods why bother impoverished EE's like myself?

I would rather discuss
something like what dithering does to the signal-to-noise ratio and the
relationship between sampling frequency, antialiasing filters, and how
close you can get to realizing the Nyquist sample rate.

-Shaun Keller (What was that outburst?)