Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: notesfiles Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!hakanson From: hakanson@orstcs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.auto Subject: Re: Re: 84 Corvette Handling, etc. Message-ID: <3000034@orstcs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 29-Jun-84 02:14:00 EDT Article-I.D.: orstcs.3000034 Posted: Fri Jun 29 02:14:00 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 27-Jun-84 00:51:37 EDT References: <153@oliven.UUCP> Organization: Oregon State University - Corvallis, OR Lines: 55 Nf-ID: #R:oliven:-15300:orstcs:3000034:000:2646 Nf-From: orstcs!hakanson Jun 20 22:14:00 1984 In the June issue of Road & Track, in Miscellaneous Ramblings, is a fairly extensive article on the improvements to the '85 Corvette. The "weaker" suspension includes the following changes: Base suspension: Front ride rate reduced from 125 to 100 lb/in. Rear ride rate reduced from 170 to 120 lb/in. Z51 suspension: Front ride rate reduced from 160 to 120 lb/in. Rear ride rate reduced from 220 to 160 lb/in. To retain the same overall roll stiffness, the front anti-roll bar diameter has been increased on both suspensions. Shocks revalved front & rear to reduce ride harshness. Bilstein shocks now come automatically with Z51, free option with base. These supposedly help tune out minor road disturbances. To reduce "dartiness," improve directional stability and returnability, and to slow down the steering a touch, caster has been increased from a nominal 3 degrees to 4. The Z51 gets 16x9.5 inch wheels at front and rear ('84 had 8.5"'ers up front) -- better directional stability and braking stability. According to GM, the improvements are worth 3 counts on their ride-harshness scale. According to the editor, "On rough surfaces where the '84 Z51 would shake your teeth out, the '85 Z51 rattles them and the '85 base suspension introduces just a mild case of chatter." So it apparently isn't "Wimp-City" for the new '85 Z51 suspension. In fact, it is predicted that it will have as good or higher (i.e. "better") numbers in the slalom and on the skidpad as its '84 counterpart. It's an exceptional balance between ride and handling that they are shooting for. To give you an idea where I stand on the issue of handling, I will quote the editor again and say that I agree wholeheartedly: In a sense, it [the '84 Z51 Corvette] is a race car for the street. [Some] will say it's a little too racy. Without disputing the Corvette's incredible handling characteristics, I would argue that its exceptional handling numbers are of little use if you can achieve them only on the rather artificial confines of a mirror-smooth proving ground. With that, I will point you to the excellent article for discussion of the other improvements (port injection, better brakes), and give yet another plug for the magazine by suggesting that you who are interested check out the March, May, June, and July issues of R&T -- they contain an enlightening series of articles in which the authors and editors attempt to define the notion of a sports car. Happy driving.... Marion Hakanson CSnet: hakanson@oregon-state UUCP : {hp-pcd,tektronix}!orstcs!hakanson