Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-vgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!brl-vgr!ron
From: ron@brl-vgr.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Roadblocks
Message-ID: <340@brl-vgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 26-Jun-84 17:20:24 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-vgr.340
Posted: Tue Jun 26 17:20:24 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 06:18:08 EDT
References: <201@isrnix.UUCP> <2277@ihuxf.UUCP> <262@ihu1h.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistics Research Lab
Lines: 12
Xref: 1291 507

Well I got my license in Maryland (where Marykand is, I don't know) where
I just signed an application to get my license upgraded for driving trucks
(but it is the same application that me and everyone else signed), I consented
to taking an alchohol test for determination of whether or not I was intoxicated.
I didn't consent to being stopped arbitrarily to see if I was violating any
crimes at the time.

Driving as a privelege is not a valid view.  The whole point of this clause
is not to find drunk drivers but to give them a means of providing prima
facie evidence that a driver is under the influence when they find a drunk one.

-Ron