Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles; site trsvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!trsvax!mikey
From: mikey@trsvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.auto
Subject: Re: Radar Jammers BEWARE - (nf)
Message-ID: <55200088@trsvax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 2-Jul-84 18:35:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: trsvax.55200088
Posted: Mon Jul  2 18:35:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 6-Jul-84 00:10:38 EDT
References: <2281@ihuxf.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:ihuxf:-228100:trsvax:55200088:000:696
Nf-From: trsvax!mikey    Jul  2 17:35:00 1984

#R:ihuxf:-228100:trsvax:55200088:000:696
trsvax!mikey    Jul  2 17:35:00 1984



I just thought I'd add a little note here.  Since the posting of the 
original radar jamming article, I've received some mail,  all POSITIVE
about my article.  However, I must admit that there was some request for
more information.  Due to the controversy that has ensued, I will post no
more articles on jamming or the legal aspects therof.  I'm also sorry, but
I will also not send out any more information about or on jammers by mail.
Perhaps I'll post ideas on natural things that can interfere with
radar that may be of interest if anyone out there has a ticket that they
think is undeserved.  Maybe even articles on radar proofing your car, if
it won't offend anybody.


mikey at trsvax