Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 7/1/84; site seismo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd!decwrl!decvax!genrad!wjh12!harvard!seismo!keith
From: keith@seismo.UUCP (Keith Bostic)
Newsgroups: net.auto,net.legal
Subject: Re: Roadblocks
Message-ID: <1693@seismo.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Jun-84 17:54:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: seismo.1693
Posted: Fri Jun 29 17:54:21 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jul-84 05:31:31 EDT
References: <201@isrnix.UUCP> <482@rayssd.UUCP>
Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
Lines: 18


> In this country your Constitutional rights ends when it denies someone
> else there. [sic]

Sorry, that's no justification at all.  What you are saying is that by
denying my rights you're protecting others' rights.  Which makes it a
moral decision as to whose rights are more important.  Let's turn the 
discussion around; I choose to protect the constitutional rights of
drivers not to be illegally detained by taking away the constitutional 
rights of 3-year old little girls to live.
		
		Keith 
			ARPA: keith@seismo 
			UUCP: seismo!keith

p.s.	No flames on the constitutionality of stopping drivers.  I'm not
	qualified to say.  I'm only responding to the logic (not) in the
	previous submission.