Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.6.2.13 $; site uiucdcs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!schwager
From: schwager@uiucdcs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.bicycle
Subject: So what's wrong w/ kickstands? - (nf)
Message-ID: <38200015@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 23:28:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.38200015
Posted: Tue Jul 24 23:28:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 27-Jul-84 04:20:49 EDT
Lines: 16
Nf-ID: #N:uiucdcs:38200015:000:467
Nf-From: uiucdcs!schwager    Jul 24 22:28:00 1984

#N:uiucdcs:38200015:000:467
uiucdcs!schwager    Jul 24 22:28:00 1984

> 
> As well, I'd prefer a model whose generator attaches just
> below (and to the rear of) the bottom bracket, about where
> kickstands ( eeuuuuggghhh ! ) are usually attached, which
> 					advTHANKSance,
> 					  Howard
> 					    Campbell.
> 
Ok, I've GOT to ask- I've seen it time and time again, but for the life
of me I can't figure out why- how come serious cyclists don't like
kickstands??
eagerly awaiting replies,
-mike schwager (...ihnp4!uiucdcs!schwager)