Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Denver Mods 4/2/84) 6/24/83; site drutx.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!hogpc!houxe!drutx!eac
From: eac@drutx.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.consumers
Subject: Re: Bothersome phone calls
Message-ID: <589@drutx.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 10-Jul-84 10:12:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: drutx.589
Posted: Tue Jul 10 10:12:23 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 11-Jul-84 01:05:38 EDT
References: <125@pyuxo.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Denver
Lines: 12

The proposed law in Florida sounds like a great idea.  Just yesterday
when I said that getting my number "unpublished" (available via information
only, not in the phone book) reduced the number of junk calls, I received
one right after work.

This is a little off the point--but women should remember that if they
are listed, a lot of kooks will phone up unless you use initials.  I
made this mistake one year since I was listed as Elizabeth Cvetic instead
of simply E. Cvetic.  What is the world coming to???

Betsy Cvetic
ihnp4!drutx!eac