Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site dciem.UUCP
Path: utzoo!dciem!ntt
From: ntt@dciem.UUCP (Mark Brader)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Feminine products commercials
Message-ID: <962@dciem.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 29-Jun-84 19:17:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: dciem.962
Posted: Fri Jun 29 19:17:48 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 04:37:01 EDT
References: <845@pyuxa.UUCP>
Organization: NTT Systems Inc., Toronto, Canada
Lines: 27

Wet C. Wheeler:
	... ads for feminine products such as douches, panty
	liners, and such.  I'm sorry ladies, but I just find them
	offensive.  I know its a natural function, but so is taking
	a crap.  We are not subjected to graphic descriptions on how
	the latest brand of toilet paper should be used.  
	
Personally, I always thought these ads were simply amusing...
precisely because the descriptions of what the products are for
are usually so NON-graphic that you have to know what they're
talking about.  Just like with toilet paper.

(Of course, I may be out of date; I haven't watched TV commercials,
 or almost none, anyway, for a couple of years.)

Too mild for net.flame?  Well, just let me add this:
Why was the article to which this is a followup* posted like THIS?

	Newsgroups: net.auto,net.flame
	Subject: Re: >55mph and legality

Still think it's too mild?  Then you must be VERY PICKY!  (There.)
Mark Brader


*Not to mention the first version of this one, which I hope I cancelled
 in time...