Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site opus.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!cires!nbires!opus!rcd From: rcd@opus.UUCP (Dick Dunn) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Lame flame Message-ID: <585@opus.UUCP> Date: Tue, 3-Jul-84 04:50:28 EDT Article-I.D.: opus.585 Posted: Tue Jul 3 04:50:28 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 13-Jul-84 03:50:49 EDT References: <2567@harpo.UUCP> Organization: NBI, Boulder Lines: 105 jrl@harpo labels himself "Mr. Arch-conservative". What an utter insult to conservative thought. (Oops, he didn't say anything about "thought"...) He let loose with what he called an "anti-liberal and bleeding hearts flame". Reparsing the title as he probably intended it and sorting through the semantic and grammatical mess, what you find is not conservatism but just another random bigoted fool. It's like a bad movie - you hope for a biting attack of satire but you get a picture of some red-faced fool spluttering in mute rage. Doesn't need any direct refutation, but it's fun to play against it... > Well I seemed to have made a mistake of condemming homosexuals in >net.singles... Yeah, it's OK. Anyone could have carelessly stumbled into a group of thoughtful people. Fortunately you realized you were out of your element. >Well I shall do so here and I will spare no mercy. Now with all due respect, what on earth can that mean? It seems to me that more than a few people are showing mercy to harpo!jrl by letting him post his tantrums - but he's hardly in a position to grant mercy. (None asked, none needed, none given.) >...YES MY SHEET IS STARTING TO SHOW. Gotta watch that spelling, jrl! It's spelled "SHIT". >...And given egnough time my baseball bat might appear also. Either that's the most crass sexual innuendo I've ever seen unrot13ed on the net, or this bozo really thinks he's capable of violence. Of course, it stops at bluster 'cause he won't even give a real name, so how much violence do you think he intends. (Ever try to FIGHT with a baseball bat? Pretty stupid idea, as I see it. I can do more damage with a Swiss Army knife.) >When does it end. If gays want to >ream each other with dildoes that's their problem but to tell be that it >is legal is another. Uh, pardon? Sounds like "It's their business but I'm making up a law against it." Look, if anyone wants something to worry about, just ponder the fact that this cat has the same vote that you do when it comes election time. >To tell me that I can't discriminate against homosexuals >is another step in turning this country into a liberal wasteland with 1/3 of >the population supporting the other 2/3. Ah, yes! Hatred, the essence of economic freedom. >...Why are some of our tax dollars >spent on research to cure AIDS. Let the faggots die of it. I briefly digress into seriousness. The reason we spend tax dollars on reasearch to cure AIDS, you stupid flaming asshole, is that it affects human beings. We don't know all of how it's transmitted, scuzzball; we don't know how to cure it, jerk; and we might like not to risk killing off the entire human race just to satisfy your perverted desire that it will remove some segment of humanity. >Use the money >to underwrite a low interest mortgage program so that hard working loyal >wasps can get a piece of the American dream before it goes away. Not sure how this affects jrl - he may well be white and Anglo-Saxon, but if he's a Protestant then I'm a mutant sand candle. Also not sure what jrl knows of the "American dream" unless he picked it up from the back of a schlock realtor's brochure. Doesn't anyone else out there remember something more than low-interest mortgages as the basis of our country? Hey, if we're going to take that philosophy, then why do we have to give 'em handouts for a mortgage? They can have one when they've worked enough to afford it. Whaddya think everyone gets a free house, buddy? I worked for mine. Get busy. >...The bleeding hearts >would say "Well how is the poor unfortunate child going to survive". The >harsh answer is that he will not. He will starve and die. And then we can >use it for fertilizer, at least we would get some return on our dollar. And if jrl loses his job because he's not doing it well (which I can easily imagine), we can let him starve and die and we'll get a WHOLE LOT of fertilizer. >...I part with roughly 36% of my income. In other words, my >style of living is reduced by 36% in order to support lazy bums on the >dole and support research for the cure of aids so homos can bugger each >other without fear... Observations: 1. Go to your tax tables and find the 36% bracket. You may now conclude that jrl is grossly overpaid. 2. Jrl apparently does not use highways. 3. Jrl has not received any public education. (You may have rashly jumped to this conclusion earlier.) > What's needed is some old fashioned ideas. >...Welfare clients need to be forced to work and those that refuse >should be made sterile so that their offspring will not become a drain... Try as I might, I couldn't come up with a response. I like hyperbole, but I can't get past the incredible criminal foundation in this one. > If you think that I am signing my name to this you > have got to be kidding. If I did the ACLU might come > down on me ! If you've ever wanted a reason to dislike the ACLU, realize that they will defend this clown's right to say everything he has said! But of course, they're right - he has a perfect right to rampant verbal abuse of all that allows him to say what he says. He is kind of gutless, though - don't you think? -- Dick Dunn {hao,ucbvax,allegra}!nbires!rcd (303)444-5710 x3086 ...Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity.