Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site watmath.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!jsgray
From: jsgray@watmath.UUCP (Jan Gray)
Newsgroups: net.flame
Subject: Re: McDonald's (San Diego) Massacre - (nf)
Message-ID: <8414@watmath.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 23-Jul-84 10:23:30 EDT
Article-I.D.: watmath.8414
Posted: Mon Jul 23 10:23:30 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 24-Jul-84 04:15:50 EDT
References: <859@pucc-h.UUCP> <34900023@convex.UUCP>, <869@pucc-h>
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 13

	It was correctly pointed out in a prior article that since he
	was a security guard, that he had legitimate access to
	firearms.  This, indeed, is true.

Hardly.  Why should an off-duty (or out of work, I'm not sure) security
guard have access to guns/rifles?


Remember that even if strong gun control legislation were implemented *now*,
it would be many years before Joe Crazy wouldn't be able to find a source
of firearms, and real criminals will always be able get them.

Jan Gray (jsgray@watmath.UUCP)   University of Waterloo   (519) 885-1211 x3870