Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site wnuxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!hw3b!wnuxb!djmolny
From: djmolny@wnuxb.UUCP (Molny)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c,net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: summary of C-standards workshop at Usenix
Message-ID: <138@wnuxb.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 3-Jul-84 10:45:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: wnuxb.138
Posted: Tue Jul  3 10:45:59 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 4-Jul-84 03:38:13 EDT
References: <4013@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: WECo. Warrenville Data Center
Lines: 5

Wouldn't the following:
     extern int foo(void,);
be an acceptable syntax to describe the condition of a function
that has *only* variable arguments and no "non-variable" args?
Ron Heiby  ...!ihnp4!wnuxa!heiby