Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!sri-unix!BLARSON@USC-ECLB.ARPA
From: BLARSON@USC-ECLB.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: summary of C-standards workshop at Usenix
Message-ID: <1733@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 7-Jul-84 23:01:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.1733
Posted: Sat Jul  7 23:01:02 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Jul-84 07:40:16 EDT
Lines: 15

From:  Bob Larson <BLARSON@USC-ECLB.ARPA>


Another possible syntax for a function with only variable arguments is:
     extern int foo(,);
and I will agree either of these is potentially confusing.

The real question is if there will be a reasonable system independent
way of declaring a function that takes variable arguments.
Some systems (i.e. prime 50 series) have microcode support of
variable arguments that is wasted by high level languages not 
supporting them.

Bob Larson <Blarson@Usc-Eclb.Arpa>
-------