Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1+some 2/3/84; site dual.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!mhuxl!ihnp4!dual!mats
From: mats@dual.UUCP (Mats Wichmann)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.news.group
Subject: Re: How About net.micro.ti99?
Message-ID: <626@dual.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Jun-84 10:58:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: dual.626
Posted: Wed Jun 27 10:58:02 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 30-Jun-84 02:35:05 EDT
References: <1113@nsc.UUCP>
Organization: Dual Systems, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 11

net.micro.ti99 has been proposed.

One more time, folks: when the volume of traffic on ti99 becomes an
aggravation for the readers of group, THEN it becomes time to
create a new group. So far, the volume (in net.micro) has been so minimal 
that I have not even noticed it - except the three messages proposing the
new group. For now, use net.micro. I don't see any point in getting into
a lengthy discussion about this either - when net.micro readers start
bitching, make the group.

	Mats