Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!wjh12!harvard!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!chris From: chris@umcp-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Re: Not 120 V at 60 Hz Message-ID: <7829@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Tue, 10-Jul-84 15:02:11 EDT Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.7829 Posted: Tue Jul 10 15:02:11 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 13-Jul-84 01:16:05 EDT References: <972@dciem.UUCP> <3137@brl-tgr.ARPA> Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept. Lines: 13 Edison was right, even if he was wrong. Back then it may have been a ``good thing'' that Tesla won out, but it turns out that at the voltages now in use on major power transmission lines have *more* loss than they would if they were D.C. (At lower voltages, A.C. is less lossy.) I don't remember where D.C. becomes more efficient than A.C., but 760kV is above that point. [Insert disclaimer: this is all from memory, so don't trust it too much.] -- In-Real-Life: Chris Torek, Univ of MD Comp Sci (301) 454-7690 UUCP: {seismo,allegra,brl-bmd}!umcp-cs!chris CSNet: chris@umcp-cs ARPA: chris@maryland