Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihuxt.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxt!ivy From: ivy@ihuxt.UUCP Newsgroups: net.misc Subject: Not 120 V at 60 Hz Message-ID: <640@ihuxt.UUCP> Date: Thu, 12-Jul-84 10:45:02 EDT Article-I.D.: ihuxt.640 Posted: Thu Jul 12 10:45:02 1984 Date-Received: Fri, 13-Jul-84 04:24:57 EDT Sender: ivy@ihuxt.UUCP Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 27 If Thomas Edison had had his way, we might be using DC for a couple of reasons. His main incentive FOR selecting DC over AC was the fact that (at the time) small AC motors did not exist. Besides the famous electric light bulb, Edison saw numerous uses for small electric motors in the home, and provided for it. It was a good choice at the time, but development of better AC machinery quickly obsoleted it. He also had a good reason to AVOID 60 Hz. It was known that, in an electrical accident, AC is more deadly than DC, and 60 Hz is the most effective frequency for stopping a heart. The Edison electric company advertised the fact that the competition's AC generator was chosen, for exactly that reason, to be used in the first electric-chair execution. The economics of AC won out, what with the wonderful things that can be done with transformers converting and isolating voltages, and motors that are smaller and longer-lived than a DC motor of the same power, and long-distance, high-voltage, transmission lines. And technology kept evolving, and capacitors got smaller and more efficient, and solid-state electronics became ever more subtle, and long-distance, high-voltage DC transmission is now most economical, and hospitals are installing DC power for safety's sake, and environmentalists are worried about the effects of AC fields on the mind... Now that everyone, even John Hopkins University, has caught up with the world and switched to AC, it may be that the world is turning back to DC.