Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: $Revision: 1.6.2.13 $; site iuvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!brennan
From: brennan@iuvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Damn it, when somebody asks a questi
Message-ID: <10600006@iuvax.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 13-Jul-84 12:31:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: iuvax.10600006
Posted: Fri Jul 13 12:31:00 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 15-Jul-84 01:30:25 EDT
References: <166@looking.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:looking:-16600:iuvax:10600006:000:984
Nf-From: iuvax!brennan    Jul 13 11:31:00 1984


>> If you feel you have to post an answer to a question,
>> PLEASE post it as a response to the original note,
>> NOT as a new note with the title 'Re: so and so'.
>> This way if a new response comes up for a note to which
>> we've already seen the answer we can skip the note and
>> all responses 'in a single bound', and not have to
>> wade through note after note of boring answers.
>> 
>> Tim Benson, University of Illinois

I agree that this would be nice for us people that use 'notes'
instead of 'news' to read the net, but how would it effect the
netters that use 'news'??  I get the feeling that us 'notes' users
are in the minority, since I here a lot about 'n' keys, and that's
not the key I use to jump to the next note.
I really only agree with Tim in principle since I read all responses
anyway because sometimes the subject changes after 8 or 10 responses.

JD Brennan
...!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!brennan	(USENET)
Brennan@Indiana			(CSNET)
Brennan.Indiana@CSnet-Relay	(ARPA)