Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site brl-tgr.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!brl-tgr!wmartin
From: wmartin@brl-tgr.ARPA (Will Martin )
Newsgroups: net.movies
Subject: Re: Siskel/Ebert Unhappiness
Message-ID: <3548@brl-tgr.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 24-Jul-84 17:08:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-tgr.3548
Posted: Tue Jul 24 17:08:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 06:33:23 EDT
References: <157@bragvax.UUCP>
Organization: Ballistics Research Lab
Lines: 9

The St. Louis TV Guide claimed that Siskel & Ebert were going to review
the films cited in the base posting in last week's show,
and a different set in this week's show. Neither of the Guide listings
corresponded with what was actually shown. I can't recall what was on
last week, but this week was "The Doctors are In", a special in which
they discussed how the careers of some actors (Al Pacino and others) could
be better if they chose other parts. So what's going on? Where are
the shows we should be seeing here? Why would some markets get one
show and other markets get a different one?