Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site alice.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!alice!alb
From: alb@alice.UUCP (Adam L. Buchsbaum)
Newsgroups: net.news.group,net.news
Subject: Re: nuke net.general? & a radical proposal
Message-ID: <2880@alice.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 27-Jun-84 11:58:54 EDT
Article-I.D.: alice.2880
Posted: Wed Jun 27 11:58:54 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Jun-84 05:32:42 EDT
References: <1023@hao.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 7

No, we cannot get rid of net.followup without getting rid
of net.general.  As you may recall, there was such a great
amount of followups to net.general items that the software
was designed to automatically post net.general followups to
net.followup; that is net.followup's sole purpose:  to hold
followups for net.general.  If you remove net.followup, you
will break the software.