Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site cvl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!amd70!fortune!hpda!hplabs!hao!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!fpa
From: fpa@cvl.UUCP (Fred Andresen)
Newsgroups: net.sci
Subject: Re: Stonehenge ditch theory
Message-ID: <1105@cvl.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 25-Jun-84 09:45:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: cvl.1105
Posted: Mon Jun 25 09:45:17 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 28-Jun-84 05:46:33 EDT
Organization: U. of Md. Computer Vision Lab
Lines: 18

[]
I have never studied Stonehenge, but have always been intrigued by it.
I have not studied ancient cultures, either.
BUT, I love to try and figure stuff out like you did.

I think your ditch theory is TRUE.  It is perfect.  Has anyone else
even attempted to explain the subtle point about levelness.
Sound good to me. Keep it up.

	Fred P. Andresen (fpa@cvl)

Send replies to:  seismo!rlgvax!cvl!fpa (USEnet)
				or
		  fpa.cvl@umcp-cs@csnet-RELAY (ARPAnet)
				or
		  fpa@cvl  (CSNet - slightly more risky)