Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!sri-unix!duntemann.wbst@XEROX.ARPA From: duntemann.wbst@XEROX.ARPA Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers Subject: Star Wars is indeed Science Fiction Message-ID: <223@sri-arpa.UUCP> Date: Fri, 20-Jul-84 13:27:12 EDT Article-I.D.: sri-arpa.223 Posted: Fri Jul 20 13:27:12 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 22-Jul-84 05:45:42 EDT Lines: 34 There isn't a blamed thing in the Star Wars saga to remove it from our own (albeit remote) future save Lucas's idiotic "Long, long ago in a galaxy far away..." Nor is there any reason to put it anywhere but in our own remote future; why people insist on the fairy tale prelude escapes me. Consider The Stainless Steel Rat books, which take place in our universe umpty-ump thousand years from now, so that the word "earth" is a synonym for soil and not the name of any given planet. (Until DeGriz gets to ride a time machine back to Old Earth, or Dirt, or whatever the name of the place was...) There's no way to draw lines between science fiction and non-science fiction without valid arguments that the lines ought to be drawn elsewhere. The internal consistency argument is actually a means of drawing a line between good writing and bad writing; both SW and ST fail that test, but whereas I'd grade Star Wars at about 55%, Star Trek gets a zero for not even bothering to try. What I suspect is bothering people about Star Wars is the intention that it be nothing beyond an adventure story. Well, yeah, that bothers me too--BUT, considering that Star Trek is really nothing more than All My Children: 2300AD, I'd say Star Trek is not science fiction either, but (bad) soap opera with pointed ears. Damned little media work passes my own personal litmus test for science fiction, which involves a high level of internal consistency, "not offending the known", and working from a set of reasonable premises toward a reasonable theme. Neither "Cowboys on Mars" (Star Wars) nor "All My Children: 2300AD" passes the test. On the other hand, not many books pass it either. I think it's a thoroughly stupid thing to throw packets after, bottom line. Let's argue about something else. --Jeff Duntemann duntemann.wbst@xerox