Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rdin.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!houxm!houxz!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!hplabs!hao!seismo!cmcl2!philabs!rdin!perl
From: perl@rdin.UUCP (Robert Perlberg)
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Another shuttlecraft question
Message-ID: <426@rdin.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 11-Jul-84 11:42:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: rdin.426
Posted: Wed Jul 11 11:42:18 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jul-84 02:20:05 EDT
Organization: Resource Dynamics Inc., New York
Lines: 21

<>

From: naiman@pegasus.UUCP
==============
How about "The Doomsday Machine", Huh, huh ??!!??

They definitely did know about the shuttlecraft there 'cause Decker used it.
Now it's true they needed the other ship to destroy the doomsday machine, but,
at no time when the transporter was broken and they were trying to get back to
the Enterprise, did anyone entertain the idea of using the shuttlecraft. WHY ?!
==============

There wasn't enough time to get a shuttlecraft over there.  The
ship was going to blow up in a matter of seconds.

Good question.

Robert Perlberg
Resource Dynamics Inc.
New York
philabs!rdin!perl