Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!bbncca!sdyer
From: sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: DMF-32 (and clones) versus DH-11 (and clones) versus DZ/KMC-11
Message-ID: <832@bbncca.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 9-Jul-84 23:49:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: bbncca.832
Posted: Mon Jul  9 23:49:09 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Jul-84 07:17:55 EDT
Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 18

Sorry to be a noodge, but I find it hard to believe that no one out there
has any opinion (not to mention actual knowledge) of this issue.
Therefore, I repeat the question:

Can anyone comment on the advantages of purchasing an ersatz DMF32
(e.g., Able VMZ32) instead of the corresponding DH/DM clone?
As some of you have heard, I am trying to configure several VAX systems,
and the advantages of one over the other of these terminal multiplexers
is beyond me.  Also, comments on the DZ11/KMC combination are welcome, too.

For background, 20-25 active terminal lines at 9600 baud in a software
development enviroment.

Ah, for the good old days when only a DH-11 was reasonable...
-- 
/Steve Dyer
{decvax,linus,ima}!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbncca.ARPA