Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!cca!ima!haddock!bill
From: bill@haddock.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: VMS & UNIX comparison rebutal (not a - (nf)
Message-ID: <204@haddock.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 6-Jul-84 23:43:09 EDT
Article-I.D.: haddock.204
Posted: Fri Jul  6 23:43:09 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Jul-84 00:21:53 EDT
Lines: 20

#R:abnjh:-70200:haddock:16700025:000:756
haddock!bill    Jul  5 18:34:00 1984


>A friend of mine (who was one of the first non-DEC people to see VMS)
>described VMS as "like a nightmare about RSX-11M".  I've never seen any
>reason to quarrel with this description.

    Having worked on one of the Unix emulators which runs under Vms, I
    would like to offer a parable:

	Defenders of Vms make much of logical names; indeed, try to
	imagine VMS without them!  However, to redirect via SYS$INPUT,
	the translated value could be 63 characters long, maximum (at
	least in VMS 3.n.  I've been away from it for a while)
	Since a VMS pathname can easily be 120+ characters, a user could
	end up S.O.L.

    VMS is incoherent; Unix is coherent.  If the software base appeals to
    you, get VMS.  I wouldn't touch it with a ten foot pole.